🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.